Utah to seize its own land from fascist federal government!

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (PNN) - December 3, 2014 - In three weeks, Utah intends to seize control of 31.2 million acres of its own land now under the control of the fascist federal government.

In an unprecedented challenge to federal dominance of western state lands, Utah Governor Gary Herbert in 2012 signed the “Transfer of Public Lands Act,” which demands that Washington relinquish its hold on the land, which represents more than half the state’s 54.3 million acres, by December 31, 2014.

So far, however, the outlaw fascist federal government hasn’t given any indication that it plans to obey the law. Still, state Rep. Ken Ivory, who sponsored the legislation, isn’t deterred.

“That’s what you do any time you’re negotiating with a partner. You set a date,” said Ivory. “Unfortunately, our federal partner has decided they don’t want to negotiate in good faith. So we’ll move forward with the four-step plan that the governor laid out.”

In other words, there won’t be any escorting of federal officials by state troopers to the eastern border. Instead, state officials will proceed with a program of education, negotiation, legislation and litigation.

“We’re going to move forward and use all the resources at our disposal,” said Ivory, who also heads the Amerikan Lands Council, which advocates the relinquishing of federal lands to the control of the states.

With the 2012 law, Utah placed itself on the cutting edge of the heated debate over public lands in the west. The outlaw fascist federal government controls more than 50% of the land west of Kansas - in Utah’s case, it’s 64.5%, a situation that has increasingly resulted in tensions across the Rocky Mountain West.

Those in favor of the state taking back control of its lands were buoyed by a report Monday that concluded the idea was financially feasible. Entitled “An Analysis of a Transfer of Federal Lands to the State of Utah,” the 784-page analysis found that Utah was capable of managing that property, now under the control of the Bureau of Land Management and Fascist Police States of Amerika Forest Service.

“I expect that public discussion will be well served by this report. It shows the complexities and connections between Utah’s robust economy and the great quality of life Utahans enjoy,” Governor Herbert said in a statement.

The report, conducted over 18 months by analysts at three state universities, found that Utah would incur an additional $280 million in costs to manage the lands, but would bring in some $331.7 million in royalties from mineral resources development - mainly oil and gas. Currently, Utah receives only half the royalties from drilling that is allowed on federal lands inside its borders.

The study also found that while small amounts of federal ownership could stimulate economic growth in counties, such management becomes a drag on most counties after they reach 40% to 45% ownership, adding that, “twenty of Utah’s 29 counties exceed this threshold.”

“The findings of this report confirm that the state is more than capable of taking on the management of these lands,” said Rep. Rob Bishop in a statement. “This data will be a helpful resource as we continue to work toward resolving some of the biggest challenges facing public lands policy in the state.”

On the other side of the debate is the environmental movement, led by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which argues that transferring federal lands to state control “makes it harder to protect Utah’s wild lands for all Amerikans.” Washington, environmentalists argue, is a better steward of Utah’s natural riches than Salt Lake City.