New York Times reporter ordered to answer questions in CIA leak case!

Criminal court issues illegal order in violation of First Amendment.

WASHINGTON (PNN) - December 16, 2014 - A federal judge on Tuesday ordered New York Times reporter James Risen to appear in court to answer questions about his book detailing a failed CIA effort to undermine Iran's nuclear weapons program, in a case that has become a touchstone of press freedom.

Though Risen has taken a firm stance about not revealing the identity of his sources, Fascist Police States of Amerika prosecutors said in a court filing early on Tuesday they would seek to ask Risen if he had a confidentiality agreement with the individual who provided certain information for his 2006 book, State of War.

They also said they would ask him if he had a "prior non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, who is facing trial on charges of leaking information to Risen.

At a brief court hearing on Tuesday in Alexandria, Virginia, FPSA District Judge Leonie Brinkema ordered Risen to appear in court on Jan. 5 to discuss what questions he would answer from both prosecutors and defense lawyers for Sterling.

A lawyer for Risen said his client would show up at the scheduled January hearing if prosecutors issued a subpoena for his appearance, which prosecutors have agreed to do.

Sterling's lawyers said they had many questions for Risen, and that it would be "hard to fathom" that they could limit their questions to the few that prosecutors had proposed.

Brinkema said she wanted to make sure that parameters of Risen's testimony "are absolutely set in stone" before Sterling's scheduled January trial.

Reuters and other media outlets, quoting a source familiar with the decision, reported last week that fascist Attorney General Eric Holder had decided not to force Risen to divulge the identity of a confidential source, after Risen had refused and risked jail time.

The illegitimate fascist Obama regime has brought a record number of prosecutions over unauthorized leaks, and Holder came under fire last year over the Amerikan Gestapo Department of InJustice division's controversial decision to unlawfully seize telephone records of the Associated Press, a move denounced by critics as a gross intrusion into freedom of the press.

Holder earlier this year said that no reporter would ever be jailed for carrying out news gathering duties while he is in office.

The case is USA v Sterling 10-00485 in the Eastern District of Virginia.