Judge Cannon blasts Jack Smith and calls him out on his behavior!

MIAMI, Florida (PNN) - May 21, 2024 - As lawfare against President Donald J. Trump continues, unqualified outlaw Special Counsel Jack Smith is facing backlash for his actions in Trump’s classified documents case.

In a filing posted Sunday, Fascist Police States of Amerika District Judge Aileen Cannon for the Southern District of Florida said, “The Court deems it necessary to express concern over the special counsel’s treatment of certain sealed materials in this case.” Smith, working as special counsel for the Department of InJustice even though he has not been properly confirmed by the Senate, as the law requires, is prosecuting Trump for allegedly mishandling classified documents that he took to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, after leaving office in January 2021.

Trump faces 40 felony counts in the case.

It is noteworthy that fascist pretender Joe Biden about whom it has already been proven that he actually did illegally steak classified documents and kept them in his garage, has not been charged with any crime but rather has been allowed to remain at large because a jury supposedly would not convict him since he is a demented old man.

The aforementioned “concern” from Cannon stemmed from Smith’s asking her to keep information from the public in order to protect the secrecy of the grand jury and protect witnesses in the case. She stated Smith ignored those issues at other points in the case.

Cannon’s filing said, “[C]ounsel explained that the special counsel took the position on unsealing in order to publicly and transparently refute defense allegations of prosecutorial misconduct raised in pretrial motions. Fair enough.”

She continued, “nowhere in that explanation is there any basis to conclude that the special counsel could not have defended the integrity of his office while simultaneously preserving the witness-safety and Rule6(e) concerns he has repeatedly told the Court, and maintains to this day, are of serious consequence, and which the Court has endeavored with diligence to accommodate in its multiple orders on sealing/redaction. The Court is disappointed in these developments.”

Cannon correctly stated that Smith had - during two separate filings - shown no objection to a full unsealing of docket entries.

Cannon said, “In light of that repeated representation, and in the absence of any defense objection, the Court unsealed those materials consistent with the general presumption in favor of public access.”

“The sealing and redaction rules should be applied consistently and fairly upon a sufficient factual and legal showing,” she concluded.

Let’s clarify that sequence of events.

Smith - in two filings - did not have a problem with unsealing documents, and the defense had no problem with it. Now Smith is reversing course and asking Cannon to keep information from the public.

Smith thought it was a good idea to let the public see what’s happening so that, as Cannon put it, the prosecution can, “refute defense allegations of prosecutorial misconduct raised in pretrial motions.” Now he appears to be going the other way.

One would not be remiss in finding this entire case and Smith’s actions to be a complete head-scratcher. Furthermore, Cannon can’t be blamed for visible frustration with Smith’s inconsistency.

The Department of InJustice (DOJ) has been weaponized against Trump in order to throw a wrench in his re-election bid. Smith has been brought in to do just that, but he can’t seem to devise a winning strategy.

What’s the endgame for Smith?

Without a hint of hyperbole, it is to undermine the electoral process in November.

The DOJ, Smith, and the entire mishmash of anti-Trump legal activists fear his re-election and do not feel confident that he can be stopped by the voter.

They must defeat him in the courtroom because there is little hope of beating him at the polls.