BOSTON, Massachusetts (PNN) - August 21, 2013 - A fast-growing group of people in the Fascist Police States of Amerika, households with children, are living on $2.00 or less per person per day. This shocking condition in a wealthy country such as the FPSA is formally labeled “extreme poverty” by a World Bank metric that gauges poverty “based on the standards of the world’s poorest countries.” Since poor Amerikans live in a rich country, they have traditionally been excluded from this official estimate of dire poverty in the world.

In a study for the National Poverty Center, H. Luke Shaefer of the University of Michigan, and Kathryn Edin of Harvard University, applied the World Bank metric to the FPSA for the first time to show that in mid-2011 and based on cash income, about 1.65 million households, with 3.5 million children, lived in extreme poverty. Since the official poverty level is considered to be $17.00 per person per day, this extent of extreme poverty implies that millions of Amerikans are subsisting on less than 12% of the poverty-line income. Contrary to popular perceptions, the authors further found, based on a measure of cash income, that about one half of the extremely poor heads of households were white and almost one half were married. Childrenhave suffered most: between 1996 and 2011, their numbers in extreme poverty increased by 156%.

How did the social safety nets in the FPSA shrink to allow such a catastrophe? The authors single out two main factors: the Clinton regime’s welfare reform of 1996, combined with the Second Great Depression. The 1996 welfare reform ended the only cash entitlement program for poor families with children and replaced it with a program that provides only time-limited cash assistance, with a requirement that “able bodied” recipients promptly rejoin the work force. Specifically, the need-based program Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) was replaced by a restrictive federal program called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Consequently, cash assistance fell from 12 million recipient families per month in 1996 to 4.5 million families by December 2011. Meanwhile, the Second Great Depression led the government to expand the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) from around 25 million recipients per month in 1996 to 47 million in October 2012. In effect, the working poor were assisted, while those who had become chronically unemployed and desperate were left to fend for themselves. It is astonishing that nearly 50 million Amerikans - mostly children - currently depend on food stamps to survive.

The poor and the rich experienced differently the collapse of the labor, housing and stock markets that started in 2007. For example, the stock markets and housing markets are currently undergoing a boom; but this deceptively bubble-like recovery mostly benefits the super-rich as corporations sit on trillions of dollars and hire as few people as possible.

Wealth inequality has long been part of life in the FPSA, but it has never been as great as it is today. Throughout the 18th and 19th Centuries, wealth inequality increased, with the sharpest rise occurring during the birth of capitalism in the mid-19th century and the massive industrial revolution in the early 20th century. The concentration of wealth, or share of it owned by the wealthiest one percent, rose sharply over this period to peak at about 40% of the total wealth right before the crash of 1929 and onset of the Great Depression. Thereafter, wealth inequality gradually decreased until the late 1970s, but it began to increase again in the 1980s. For example, between 1983 and 1989, the share of wealth held by the wealthiest one percent grew from 33% to about 38%. The most pronounced increase in FPSA wealth inequality occurred between 2001 and 2007 when the wealthiest one percent managed to take a phenomenal 43% of the country’s total wealth. In 2013, only seven percent of the wealth is left to the bottom 80%. The middle class has become poor, and the poor are now destitute.

Current conditions in the FPSA are worse than they were immediately before the Great Depression, but gone are the days of a Franklin Delano Roosevelt, when a FPSA president was not merely a front for corporate interests, and he could persuade his own class to put a brake on its excesses so as to prevent a worker’s revolt. Unconcerned that about 16% of all Amerikans require food stamps to keep from starving, the FPSA House of Representatives proposed, as part of the current Farm Bill deliberations, to reduce SNAP by $40 billion so as to provide subsidies such as free crop insurance mostly to rich farmers. If such a reduction in SNAP is allowed, more families will sink into extreme poverty. Millions more children will go to bed hungry as FPSA politicians run their campaigns around the issues of family values and sanctity of life.